ORATORY VERSUS OAFISHNESS
Manners may “maketh the man”, but words distinguish leadership.
A few hours before the U.S. raid into Venezuela, I watched “The Darkest Hour”, which ends with Sir Winston Churchill’s speech, that Edward R. Murrow encapsulated as: “He mobilized the English language and sent it into battle.”
The speech is best known for its clarion call: “We shall fight on the beaches….we shall never surrender…”
Churchill “… presented a factual and reasoned case, provided the public with new information and, crucially, provided them with the context necessary to understand it.”
Donald Trump’s version of that was to describe the Venezuela operation as “…one of the most stunning, effective and powerful displays of American military might and competence in American history”
On one level, that’s fair comment. It did, after all, require: B‑1B Lancer bombers; F‑22 Raptors, F‑35 Lighting II, and F/A‑18 Super Hornet fighters, EA-18 Growler electronic attack planes, E‑2 Hawkeye early warning aircraft, various intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance aircraft, drones, an aircraft carrier and sundry other warships to kidnap a man (and his wife) whose own armed forces were either so ineffectual or suspect that he employed Cuban bodyguards.Trump described it as “…like I was watching it on a television And if you would have seen the speed, the violence. You know that they say the speed, the violence.” and added that President Nicolas Maduro had been “bum rushed” to a waiting helicopter.
At the risk of sounding churlish, that’s videogame-ising, as opposed to mobilising the English language.
His later agreement of “kidnapped” as an apt description of it, puts Trump in interesting company: Latin American and Haitian gangs, Sicilian bandits and Islamic fundamentalist groups in Nigeria, the ones he threatened to go after with “guns blazing” to eradicate and save “our beloved Christians” (presumably the ones who bought his Bibles).
Blazing guns turned out to be more than 16 Tomahawk missiles on targets in Sokoto State, on the opposite side of the country from the militant group in Nigeria with the best- documented links to the Islamic State .
A few days later in another state unidentified gunmen abducted civilians and students from a Catholic school.
TAKEOVERS-R-US
The recurring theme in Trump’s clarifications of the Venezuela TV show is telling and dubious at the same time. “We’re going to take back the oil that, frankly, we should have taken back a long time ago.”
The oil being under Venezuelan soil, by any ethical measure, “take back” is a euphemism for steal.
The thought processes that don’t recognise that are consistent with what passes for oratory in MAGAland; incomplete ideas expostulated in incoherent sentences, punctuated by lies enveloped in a vapour of anger and resentment.
The latter characterises even those in his orbit who do speak actual English. The weirdest manifestation of empathy deficiency in the Trump administration is White House Deputy Chief of Staff (or perhaps more accurately, Trump Manipulator in Chief) Stephen Miller, who told CNN’s Jake Tapper: “We live in a world, in the real world, that is governed by strength, that is governed by force, that is governed by power.”
Thus did Miller officially add the U.S. to the “We-Have-a-Right-to-Rule-Whatever-We-Say-We-Have-a-Right-To” axis: China (Taiwan), Russia (Ukraine), and Israel (Gaza and the Occupied West Bank) .
Trump’s justifications for his actions and covets are as inchoate as his rhetoric.
Having proclaimed that the U.S. Navy had Venezuela “surrounded”, he told reporters on Air Force One: “Greenland is covered with Russian and Chinese ships all over the place.”
Actually, 80 percent of Greenland is covered with ice, which makes it the second largest ice mass in the world, after Antarctica.
Trump’s patent ignorance of both Greenland and its people is evident in Miller’s simplistic, to say nothing of hubristic remark that “the formal position of the US government is that Greenland should be part of the US.”
For what it’s worth, my perception of Greenland can be found by clicking here.
Nothing in Greenland’s history suggests bullying or threats will induce its inhabitants to meekly hand over sovereignty of a place they have lived in, against all the odds of Nature, for millennia.
Winston Churchill is universally hailed as one of history’s greatest orators, not least because of his ability to use words to inspire and motivate people.
Obfuscation, ignorance, incoherence, self-aggrandisement and videogame-speak aren’t even competitive when it comes to earning respect, or even comprehension.
It would be more than unfair to expect Donald Trump, or any other politician to come close to emulating Churchill.
But it should be clear by now that when it comes to maintaining allies, and respect, Churchillian rhetoric trumps Trumpian.
Comments are welcomed. Click CONTACT on the site header.
To receive e‑mail alerts to new posts, Click SIGN-UP on the header.
8 thoughts on “ORATORY VERSUS OAFISHNESS”
Trump & his Cabinet’s rhetoric fits with the state of education they are trying to create in the U.S. Steven Miller probably did read 1984 & took it to heart. Then from his lips to Trump’s ear.
Scary, but alas, plausible
I always enjoy your informative observations and verbal eloquence Allen.
Thanks mate
Loved this piece Pizzey. Hopefully we’ll get through this period of history, but could u send me some info on cabins for sale on your lake, just in case?
Thanks.
We welcome refugees on our lake, but we do have our own version of ICE…fortunately, the fun kind
Eloquently said, Allen.
Thanks Mark