CAN YOU HEAR YOURSELF THINK? DIDN’T THINK SO
“Silence is the sleep that nourishes wisdom.” The chances of enjoying that 16th century insight from philosopher Francis Bacon are slim to nil in today’s world. But a little more peace and quiet would go some way to starving the ignorance with which society is progressively bloating.
Not only is there too much noise of every kind, many people seem to find it not just tolerable, but necessary. Surely the need for “personal space” should also include silence, or as close as we can come to it, anyway.
As noted ad nauseum, my preferred way of escaping the discordance of modern life is paddling a kayak, which isn’t everyone’s idea of fun, never mind a necessity.
Early one morning, drifting below a cliff face, listening to a pair of osprey chicks calling for their parents to return with food, the only other person on the lake paddled towards me, removed a pair of high-end ear buds and asked me what I was listening to. He’d never heard osprey before and had no idea what they were, because he paddled to music. If it’s soothing, I can, up to a point, understand that.
What I cannot come to grips with is people who look for relief from other people’s noise by turning up the volume in their ears so high, anyone within a radius of six feet can thump along with it.
That’s the “personal enjoyment” equivalent of an even worse auditory sin, broadcasting every utterance of political office-seekers with neither the rhetorical skills nor the policies to merit being heard.
The media has the means to keep the volume at a reasonable level. Instead they provide the equivalent of the mythical “11” amp setting in “This Is Spinal Tap”, the now classic 1984 mockumentary about the loudest band in the world.
Mainstream media outlets fall over themselves to maintain the “principle” that politician’s claims must be reported in the name of fairness and informing the public of what their wanna-be and putative leaders claim. Fine. But if a statement is untrue, or contradicts what the blowhard said in the past, doesn’t fairness to the public obligate pointing that out immediately?
Un-caveated disseminating of whatever campaigning politicians blurt and blat whenever they encounter an audience or a microphone, is the triumph of noise and nonsense over wit and wisdom.
A PAUCITY OF OPTIONS
Of course we can turn the news off and ignore the whole process. It wouldn’t be silence, but it sure would be mentally more peaceful. However, it would also be abrogating civic duty, to say nothing of maybe making the wrong choice when the chance to exercise the time-honoured political sentiment “throw the bums out”, comes along. The likelihood of the next lot being much better is, I concede, dim at best. Giving them another turn at bat is however, an even worse option.
It’s on a par with believing noisome “reality” shows are real, which requires ignoring the reality that there’s at minimum a camera crew, director, lighting tech, gaffers, hair and make-up artists on hand, which is a far cry from anything remotely resembling reality.
The hell of it, as a simple sage I once knew used to preface summing up anything he considered untoward, was deftly summed up by Bob Dylan in “All Along the Watchtower”: “There’s too much confusion here/I can’t get no relief.”
In that regard, I’ve come to envy the herons who live along the shoreline here.
When one swooped in front of me because I disturbed him, I took it to be a well-deserved version of the bird equivalent of flipping me the bird. (Earlier this year a Canadian judge recently ruled the gesture “a God-given right”.)
It also ought to be a right to shop without being aurally mugged. It’s certainly sensible.
As far back as the 1980s studies found that “supermarket sales went up by 38% when stores played slow music instead of fast music.”
What a treat it would be if stores heeded that, instead of blaring music only teenagers can love out of what often seem to be 1960s quality speakers.
In a store where the “music” was so offensively loud it made thoughtful consideration of purchases impossible, the manager to whom I complained said; “My staff likes it.”
“In that case,” I said, “I hope they spend a lot of money here, because I intended to, but I’m out of here.” He didn’t seem to get the point.
Seventy-five years ago the late Swiss writer and philosopher Max Picard concluded that: “Nothing has changed the nature of man so much as silence.”
Like most annoying or unnecessary things, it has done so for the worst. and the volume just keeps going up.
Comments are welcomed. Click CONTACT on the site header.
To receive e‑mail alerts to new posts, Click SIGN-UP on the header.
5 thoughts on “CAN YOU HEAR YOURSELF THINK? DIDN’T THINK SO”
Did you see the movie about monks called Into Great Silence?
(From Kate’s daughter: she passed at 91 in 2015)
No I didn’t. Is it old?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Into_Great_Silence
I’m so with you on this, Pizz. While our daily lives are packed with noise, we go to the Kruger Park and other reserves for exactly this, the bird calls and the vast silence of the night sky. And at the end of this year I have booked us 6 nights at ‘off the grid’ in the middle of nowhere places in the Karoo, where we are promised silence and owl calls. Reading your piece makes me want to get there sooner than later.
I appreciate this article perhaps more than any other I have read this year. A conscious reduction in ambient noise permits the quiet music of our Earth to remind us that it is not far above us that silence dominates the Universe.
It prompted me to look up an old short poem I wrote:
I used to gaze at the stars a lot
until I realized that stars are not
the most interesting things in the evening sky
it’s the space between them that catches my eye
the black fabric of the infinite
that shrinks me to insignificance
but for my role as a humble steward of meaning