COSTS AND LESSONS: IRAN VS ARTEMIS
The look at the dark side of the moon from Artemis II will not briefly unite humanity the way “one small step for a man” did. But it will offer a measure of the forces that have riven us from that brief awareness of what humans can accomplish.
Setbacks and problems large and niggly tested the patience of Artemis’ supporters and the resolve of its many engineers.
In his speech to the nation (and by virtue of his position in the world), President Donald Trump spent 35 seconds talking about Artemis.
Then he urged Americans to see the Iran war as an “investment” in their future.
It’s difficult to see how, compared to Artemis, that is in any way, “bang-for-buck”.
According to the Iran War Cost Tracker, a few minutes before this blog was posted, the price tag was just on $40-billion and clicking up faster than a petrol (or gas) pump filling an SUV.
Click here to watch, and be appalled.
An estimate by NASA’s Inspector General puts the cost of Artemis at around 93-billion so far. And that’s over several years, as opposed to just over a month for the Iran spectacular.According to Trump “In these past four weeks, our armed forces have delivered swift, decisive, overwhelming victories on the battlefield. Victories like few people have ever seen before”.
And just in case the Iranians or anyone else thought that added up to victory: “Over the next two to three weeks, we’re going to bring them back to the stone ages, where they belong.”
On more rational and useful level, Artemis is conducting experiments with something called “organ-on-a-chip technology”. Roughly the size of a USB thumb drive, it mimics human tissue function on a micro scale. Among its potential benefits are advancements in individualized treatments for diseases such as cancer.
Artemis is crewed by three Americans and a Canadian. Among their tasks is launching “CubeSats”, mini satellites provided by Germany, South Korea, Saudi Arabia and Argentina to conduct research on radiation, space weather and communication systems.
That’s cooperation among nations seeking knowledge for the good of us all, even though back on Earth they have to deal with Trump’s predilection for hurling insults and threats at anyone who does not genuflect before his whims.
LESSONS UNLEARNED
Listening to exchanges between the crew of Artemis and the techs at Mission Control is an object lesson in how well even the most complex issues can be dealt with and resolved when people communicate clearly and succinctly.
U.S. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth insisted Tuesday that Trump has “internalized” lessons from previous, drawn-out U.S. conflicts
in Iraq and Afghanistan, and is “not going to repeat those lessons.”
He also called his boss “unpredictable”, which is supposedly an asset.
Unpredictable is defined as, among other things: “ not able to be known or declared in advance.”
Incoherent, a related word, means “ lacking orderly continuity, arrangement, or relevance.”
Both seem to fit Trump in equal measure, which does not add up to anything resembling useful communication, let alone a strategy to bring peace and prosperity to anyone.
Describing the war as “an excursion” and “a little journey” and then avowing that you are “unstoppable as a military force” hardly ranks as PR genius either.
Based on their espionage record and self-image, Israel ought to have a much clearer idea of where the war is going. But their public utterances belie that.
Senior Israeli officials described the Iranian regime as battered but resilient, stable and feeling triumphant.
That doesn’t sound much as though ayatollahs hink they’re losing to two of the world’s most powerful militaries.
But apparently the Americans and Israelis think more than a thousand civilians deaths, widespread destruction of civilian infrastructure at the cost of hundreds of billions of dollars worth of weaponry. is a better idea than looking for a ceasefire at least.
Being in the Israeli orbit is putting the U.S. on a trajectory to committing war crimes.
Trump threatened to expand the war by targeting energy and civilian infrastructure, and said that if a deal was not reached shortly, and the Strait of Hormuz remained closed, he would attack Iran’s electrical generation plants, oil wells and desalination plants.
In space, allies and friends take calculated risks in the common cause of discovery and progress.
Warmongers and criminals, on the other hand, risk their nation’s souls and the future their children must surely dream of as they watch Artemis.
The spacecraft that really will, in the immortal Star Trek catchphrase, “Boldly go where no human has gone before”, is named Integrity, an attribute increasingly conspicuous by its absence back here on Earth.
Comments are welcomed. Click CONTACT on the site header.
To receive e‑mail alerts to new posts, Click SIGN-UP on the header.
c.
One thought on “COSTS AND LESSONS: IRAN VS ARTEMIS”
I can’t wait for ‘Integrity’ to return to the USA.