KOWTOWING TO CURTAIL 60 MINUTES
Let me be clear from the outset that this week’s “atypical perspective” is slightly distorted by personal bias. Having worked for the best of CBS News bosses, I suggest current controlling shareholder Shari Redstone read some broadcast history, watch a movie and consider her relationship to the “glass ceiling”.
Doing so might help her reassess her efforts to interfere with the editorial independence of 60 Minutes instead of digging in her heels to defend it.
The abrupt resignation of executive producer Bill Owens is stark evidence of the potential consequences.
Owens based his decision to leave the storied broadcast on the best reasons: principles, integrity and the courage of his convictions.
The pressures that forced him to make that painful choice are based on the worst reasons: delusions of grandeur, weakness and greed.
In an oft-quoted 1958 speech, Edward R Murrow, arguably the lodestar of CBS News, said that TV “…can teach; it can illuminate; yes, and even it can inspire” . but unless there is determination to use it for those ends “…it’s nothing but wires and lights in a box.”
As for monetary value, Murrow noted: ”There is no suggestion here that networks or individual stations should operate as philanthropies. But I can find nothing in the Bill of Rights or in the Communications Act which says that they must increase their net profits each year, lest the Republic collapse.”
Kowtowing to what legal experts have termed President Donald Trump’s “frivolous lawsuit” over the handling of an interview with Kamala Harris during the last presidential campaign, however, contributes to undermining said Republic.
The real crux of the matter is the Trump administration’s less than subtle threat to block a merger of Ms Redstone’s Paramount and the Hollywood studio Skydance, which would make her an estimated 530-million dollars.
If she cares a whit about how that will factor into the balance sheet of her legacy, she might want to reflect upon how wealth features in the lasting image of her predecessors.
William Paley was rich, but is best remembered for having bought the precursor to CBS and turned into what became known as “The Tiffany Network”, for both its courageous, independent journalism and groundbreaking entertainment shows like “All in the Family”.
Laurence Tisch had more money than he could probably count, but his efforts to turn CBS News into a cash cow earned him this quote in a New York Times obituary: ‘He took an institution that was important in this country, and he strangled it.”
PRINCIPLE VS PRESSURE
Entertainment being synonymous with Paramount, I recommend that if she hasn’t already, Ms Redstone watch “The Post”, Steven Spielberg’s movie about the Washington Post publishing the Pentagon Papers.
The movie is in no way a documentary, but it “does do a relatively good job in showing perhaps the most important battle that tested First Amendment rights and government’s attempts to repress a story by the press.”
Producer Amy Pascal described the film as “… the story of a woman finding her voice, and an entire country finding its voice.”
It’s also the story of standing with journalists and the principles and integrity of the organisation in whose name they labour.
That’s what good editors and proprietors do, accountants and lawyers be damned.
.Which brings us to…
THE GLASS CEILING
The metaphor in feminism for the invisible barrier of discriminatory gender stereotypes preventing women from rising beyond a certain point in an organization or hierarchy, was very much in place when the Pentagon Papers story broke.
As Katherine Graham did before her, it can be argued that by any measure Ms Redstone has broken it too.
So why, it seems fair to ask, is she willing to metaphorically sweep the bits and pieces up to appease a misogynist who’s been convicted of sexual abuse, and accused by 25 women, on the record, of similar offences?
Jane Gooodall, whom no less than National Geographic dubbed “the world’s preeminent primatologist and champion for animal conservation”, summed up her life’s work this way:
“What you do makes a difference, and you have to decide what kind of difference you want to make.”
Or, you can just opt to make a lot more money.
The choice is yours, Ms Redstone.
Comments are welcomed. Click CONTACT on the site header.
To receive e‑mail alerts to new posts, Click SIGN-UP on the header.
.
2 thoughts on “KOWTOWING TO CURTAIL 60 MINUTES”
Nice thoughts Allen .. but I think it’s pretty obvious what choice Ms Redstone has made. The word that comes to mind when considering today’s uber-wealthy is “craven.”
ah yes, the battle between principal and principle…heroes on one side(see bill owens)
and villains(corporate powers) on the other…
as tina brown said “journalists are only as
courageous as their bosses allow them to be”…
and let’s face it…the bosses don’t want any
reporting that rocks their bottom line…
it is a very uneven playing field and one that
is shrunk by tightened out-of-bounds markings…
allen, you and I, and our colleague john reade
would have no place in most parts of today’s
journalism…
specific to CBS News, it’s all about getting the
meager through the FCC…Ms. Restone will pay
whatever is necessary to settle the meritless
trump suit…mediation started yesterday with
no progress yet reported but CBS will cave and
give a mighty contribution to the trump library…
one quibble, I believe it was the NYTimes that
published the first Pentagon Papers installment…the WaPost published five days later after Katherine Graham defied the paper’s
lawyers and said “let’s publish”…
her decision was the moment that elevated the
Post to the highest levels of journalism…
where are you now, Mrs. Graham?