OF SANTA DENIERS AND AID CUTTERS
The sad beings who put a sign reading “Santa Is Fake” in a window along a Christmas parade route, and Western nations who’ve made unprecedented cuts to aid budgets have something in common: neither see the value in what they are denigrating.
The anti-Santa pettiness (in, I’m sad to say, my hometown of Brantford, Ontario) prompted enough upset calls that the police put out a statement that said in part: “While it isn’t illegal to be a ‘Grinch’, we do encourage everyone to embrace the spirit of the season…”
Disliking and disparaging the rampant “Christmas spirit” commercialism that predominates from September onwards is completely understandable.
Deeming it necessary, or useful, to deny children that brief period in life when they can frolic in innocent anticipation and the joy of it being fulfilled, however, makes no sense.
Kids don’t need adults to tell them there isn’t really an overweight bearded man in a sleigh pulled by flying creatures who lands with a giant sack of toys on the roof of every house in the world in one night. They work it out on their own, which ought to come as no surprise to any parent who raises one to the point of literacy.
And anyway, the disappointment of the revelation is short-lived, and a subtle lesson that will help them cope as the harsher aspects of life — illness, failures big and small, economic challenges and eventually, the prospects of mortality — become their reality.
ON A MORE BRUTAL SCALE
Meanwhile perhaps, or more likely because they live in places where the Christmas spirit doesn’t have great commercial or societal appeal, by the time it is over with this year, child mortality will have increased worldwide for the first time this century.
According to the Gates Foundation’s annual Goalkeepers report, the number of children dying before their fifth birthday is projected to increase to 4.8 million, up 200,000 since 2024.
The blame for that lies squarely at the feet of the world’s major developed countries, whose leaders’ equivalent of Santa’s bag of presents is aid for developing countries, which has plunged 27 percent. Slashing what for most Western nations amounts to a tiny percentage of overall spending, will have a serious negative effect on progress against killer diseases including HIV, malaria, and polio.
Oxfam America estimated that the shutdown of USAID alone threatens 23 million children’s access to education , and means up to 95 million people face losing basic healthcare, “potentially leading to more than 3 million preventable deaths per year.”
On a political level that’s blind misuse of what’s known as “soft power”.
Defined as “a persuasive approach to international relations, typically involving the use of economic or cultural influence”, it’s how to make friends instead of enemies.
Forty years ago this week, the British supergroup Band Aid released “Do They Know It’s Christmas” to raise money for Ethiopian famine victims.
The horrors of the famine were well reported, and hence the response to the song, and the appeal, was massive.
If a similar effort was made to support Sudan, which the UN and aid agencies agree is the greatest humanitarian disaster in the world today, and perhaps ever in modern times, one doubts it would be anywhere near as successful.
The reason for that goes beyond the tired but somewhat understandable excuse of “donor fatigue”.
It’s because unlike Ethiopia, the foreign Press can’t get in.
TV in particular, has a unique ability to make suffering graphic and real, to follow the dictum of one of my first news editors: “If you can find a heart string, pluck it.”
It’s the key to opening purse strings.
The killing and destruction in Gaza is documented only because there are brave local journalists who, without the luxury of time, sufficient resources and back-up, strive daily try to tell the story even as they live it.
And even when human-made disasters like Sudan and Gaza are accessible to the cameras, the reports now carry the pro forma warning: “Viewers may find some images disturbing.”.
As someone who spent a considerable chunk of a working career exposing those kinds of images, I can’t shout it loud enough: “Of course they’re disturbing, If they weren’t, there’d be no reason to show them.”

TV outlets whose owners and editors think otherwise when reporting the human condition, should consider changing their logos to the three monkeys gif.
Because if you neither see, hear nor peak of evil ‚then evil is what you get.
And anyone who sees that as in any way acceptable, is probably the kind of person who thinks kids need to be told Santa isn’t real.
Comments are welcomed. Click CONTACT on the site header.
To receive e‑mail alerts to new posts, Click SIGN-UP on the header.