The Afghans Have a Proverb for It
The 19th century struggle for dominance in Afghanistan was dubbed “The Great Game’.
The 21st century version is looking increasingly like ‘The Grotesque Game’; summed up neatly by an Afghan proverb: “While the butchers were arguing, the cow dropped dead.”
The tragedy — among many — is that anyone is surprised that the rag-tag Taliban is ascendant and the U.S. and NATO-trained and equipped Afghan forces are either barely holding on, or in retreat.
In his thriller “The Afghan”, Frederick Forsyth wrote: “There is an aphorism that you cannot buy the loyalty of an Afghan, but you can always rent it.”
As of 2020 the U.S. alone had spent an estimated two TRILLION dollars fighting the war and shoring up successive Afghan governments.
Much of it disappeared into “the massive financial malfeasance, fraudulent contracts and a gargantuan bank scandal that have been the subject of numerous U.S. investigations of wasted and stolen money in Afghanistan.”
Not what even a committed optimist would call value for money.
By comparison, the Taliban cuts bargain basement deals. Several dozen prisoners in Badghis province were freed early July in a jail break the provincial governor said was facilitated by prison employees who were paid off by the Taliban.
Reports that ‘arrangements’ with government forces allowed the Taliban to take districts with little to no resistance make Forsyth’s aphorism read more as fact than fiction.
A HISTORY OF HORRORS
The U.S. and Britain have accused the Taliban of massacring civilians and committing other atrocities that may amount to war crimes. Again, why would anyone be surprised?
The most-frequently quoted lines in Rudyard Kipling’s 19th century poem “A Young British Soldier” are:
“When you’re wounded and left
On Afghanistan’s plains,
And the women come out
To cut up your remains
Just roll on your rifle
And blow out your brains,
And go to your Gawd
Like a soldier.”
A review of “The Great Gamble: The Soviet War in Afghanistan”, (by Gregory Feifer) noted that the mujahadeen sometimes flayed captured Soviet soldiers alive by cutting the skin around the belt, yanking the loose skin up over the prisoner’s head and tying it off like a potato sack. Other reports quote Western witnesses as having seen Soviet captives staked out, sliced open and left to die slowly in the hot sun.
And the “muj” were “the good guys”, cheered and armed by the West.
It’s become an article of faith that the only hope for Afghanistan is a peace deal between the Taliban and whatever government remains viable in Kabul. Negotiating one remains more wishful thinking than probability. The Taliban aren’t an all-for-one-and-one-for-all entity.
A BRIEF GLIMPSE
Shortly after the war began, a small gaggle of foreign journalists was taken across the Pakistan border to Spin Boldak, where the Taliban was born. We were locked into a walled compound that looked like a disused sports field. Some of our “hosts” were cold to the point of hostile, others borderline friendly. One of them, who spoke good English, asked if he could use our satellite phone to call his cousin, who had a restaurant in Seattle. We often let U.S. soldiers and refugees call relatives, so I figured, why not?
The subsequent conversation was in Pashtun, and our translator wasn’t to hand. I suddenly had serious misgivings. What if I just handed a Taliban the means to pass a code word that would trigger a terrorist operation?
Thankfully, I was being paranoid. The Talib said his cousin was doing well and loved America, and he hoped to go and visit him when the business to hand was over.
FRACTIOUS FACTIONS
Overnight, our hosts split into two factions; one was willing to take us on to Khandahar, the other wanted to send us back to Pakistan. The walls around the compound were lined with bearded young men squatting on their haunches, with seemingly nothing better to do than stare and occasionally toss pebbles at us. The couple of hours it took to pack up and cross the border were tense, to say the least.
That the Taliban is factionalised is part and parcel of their being Afghans. The country’s population of 38 million is splintered by more than 50 ethnic or sub-tribal groups, riven and complicated by clannish rivalries and feuds.
But that is by no means immutable. The Afghans I was privileged and pleased to have as colleagues in the post-invasion offices CBS News established in Kandahar and Kabul were prime examples of the best Afghan traits. Unfortunately, it will be no surprise if their antithesis ends up running the country.
The Afghans have a proverb to sum up that, too: “The world will not find rest by just saying ‘peace’.”
Comments are welcome. Just click CONTACT.
To receive alerts about new posts, click SUBSCRIBE.
14 thoughts on “The Afghans Have a Proverb for It”
Piz- deftly writ, as is your habit. My cup runneth over:
Kipling, the old saw about renting them for an afternoon
(which I first heard in the very early ’60s about the Congolese
parliament and the grisly details in Gregory Feifer’s book–topped by the dead cow saying. Your hand has never
lost its touch. Salute l’artiste. Jon Randal
jonrandl20o4@yahoo.com
Merci my old mate
see above
a taliban commander told me that his end game was built around the words of sun tzu, author
of the art of war…
“there is no instance of a nation benefitting from
prolonged warfare”…he added that his group knew America would eventually grow impatient
and frustrated waging a “long war”…
he thought his crowd would eventually rule
the countryside and most major provincial
cities…and then slowly strangle
kabul into submission…
looks as if, eight years ago, he was prescient…
yeah, and theoretically the art of war is required reading in u..s military academies
Thanks for the perspective and insight , more please !
Just read Edmund Richardson’s brilliant Afghanistan book ‘Alexandria the Quest for Lost City’ about the search for Alexander the Great’s city in Afghanistan amid the British colonial occupation in the 1800s. Found at Baghram it seems…Same story then, shifting loyalties. We just don’t learn
Larry.…Please call me its Alan 973 362 6066
Alan Monday Jr
as part of my interview with the talib commander
we spent some time comparing the monthly
costs of maintaining a taliban fighter v an
American soldier…
i recall the commander estimated a $36 a month
cost for one of his fighters and as I recall, and
using numbers from the pentagon. that was
many, many hundreds percent lower…granted
the Taliban “enlisted” populist support…i.e.
the “sharing” of food, livestock, housing, taxes,
etc. but the discrepancy left open the question
of how much U.S. money was being wasted…
part of that pentagon number and verified
by the office of the SIGAR(special investigator
for afgan relief) went into the pockets of corrupt
military and government officials…and now we
have pledged billions more to the same group…
better to use that money to get our afghan friends, translators, local contractors, out of
harm’s way…does anyone believe the Taliban
pledge to play nice with these folks?
Now that is a telling statistic is it not…
How to explain the incredibly rapid taliban advance? Rommel defined the blirzkrieg but this looks like a collapse foretold. As they used to say: who benefits?
Same answer as to “who loses? …No one who deserves it
easily explained…
there was never a 300,000 strong afghan national army…
a good portion of this “force” was ghost fighters
whose salaries went into the pockets of corrupt
military and political leaders…
those left understandably lost the will to fight
for a government that had abandoned them…
and the American withdrawal further eroded
their confidence and their ability to fight…
it was easy to be “tough” when the world’s
the mightiest armory was available…both
American planners and afghan leaders never
got their heads around just how reliant the
ANA was on American support…a 20 year history should have made this apparent…
i tremble thinking of the many afghan friends
allen and I have made as their country stumbles
into chaos…the answer to “who benefits?”…
no one, no one at all…