THE SHAMELESS ARE RIDICULOUS
“Shame may restrain what law does not prohibit.”
If the ancient Roman statesman and philosopher Seneca who wrote that had met Jeff Bezos and his ilk, he might have added the caveat. “but only in those decent enough to recognise, or care, when something is fundamentally wrong.”
Shame is defined as “a painful feeling of humiliation or distress caused by the consciousness of wrong or foolish behaviour.”
Those incapable of the emotion are the embodiment of ridiculous. Bezos’ gutting of the Washington Post puts him in that category.
At the time of writing, neither he nor his spokesperson had commented on the opprobrium his perfidy has garnered in proportion to the profits he covets.
Maybe he has a modicum of shame?
But that would require a passing acquaintance with history and morality, so I guess not.
If he had anything resembling male attributes that come in pairs, Mr Bezos would at least make a personal appearance in the Post’s decimated newsroom to explain why he feels lavishing $75-million on ”Melania”, the bribe passing for a documentary, and then firing respected journalists and effectively trashing one of the best known and most respected newspapers in the U.S., if not the Western world, is nothing to be ashamed of.
The late televangelist Billy Graham (whose “profession” I generally hold in lower-than-a-snake’s‑belly regard) was being rather harsh on ordinary folk when he lamented: “Self-centered indulgence, pride and a lack of shame over sin are now emblems of the American lifestyle.” But he pigeon-holed the third or fourth richest man in the world, and a goodly number of his fellow billionaire CEO ‚with precision bordering on divinely-inspired.
For proof, refer to the Epstein files that have been released so far.
CRETINS-IN-ARMS
If having no shame whatsoever was an Olympic sport, Israel’s behaviour over the Rafah border crossing between Gaza and Egypt would be a shoo-in for the gold medal.
UN officials estimate around 18,500 people, some 4,000 of them children, desperately need to leave Gaza to get treatment for war wounds or serious illnesses, including cancer.
Rafah is the only route available.
Having decimated Gaza’s medical services and barred medical NGOs and other aid agencies from working freely amid the ruins, the Israeli military is still curtailing the flow of aid, including medical supplies into the enclave, while severely restricting the daily number of sick and injured Gazans allowed to struggle through a morass of bureaucratic and security checks to reach help elsewhere.
On Tuesday of this week, only 16 of about 100 who showed up to try, made it.
If that’s what it takes for the Middle East’s best-armed and self-proclaimed world’s most moral army to ensure the safety and security of Israel, shame and ridiculous apply in equal measure.
A less brutal but no less ridiculous example of no sense of shame is the six decades-old U.S. obsession with punishing Cuba for insisting on and maintaining its own system of government, inefficient and repressive though it may be.
President Donald Trump decreed that any country supplying vital oil to Cuba will be punished with tariffs.
Considering an island with a population roughly equal to New York City and a GDP 80 times lower than the U.S, a threat requiring that kind of counter measure, ought to be a source of shame, not a battle cry.
Then again, such is the level of Trump’s personal insecurity that he feels it necessary to sue CBS, NBC and the Wall Street Journal for purported slights, claim $15 billion from the New York Times for being “nasty” to him, call for late night talk show hosts who criticise him to be taken off the air and sue comedian Trevor Noah, whom he calls “a total loser”, for making Epstein jokes.
Add in the litany of outrageous and blatant lies Trump barks as easily as he breaths and pretty much as often, and you have a man with a lack of shame that surpasses ridiculous.
ABOVE AND BEYOND
On a global level, NewSTART, the treaty to limit nuclear weapons, has been allowed to expire, with no plans to replace it, raising the danger of a new nuclear arms race.
The existing stockpile of nukes has “the potential to cause catastrophic destruction on a global scale.”
Between 100-million and one billion people would die, 80 percent of the infrastructure would be destroyed, and global climate patterns would be disrupted, leading to widespread famine and disease.
If not doing whatever is possible to prevent that isn’t shameful and ridiculous, then pretty much nothing is.
Those who have no shame can be measured by a line from the Book of Proverbs: “The wise inherit honour, but fools get only shame.”
Comments are welcomed. Click CONTACT on the site header.
To receive e‑mail alerts to new posts, Click SIGN-UP on the header.