UNKNOTTING AN ETERNAL KNOT
History, egos, ambition and hubris have entangled the Middle East into a political and security Gordian knot. Mythology has it that the ends of impossibly complex tangle were hidden, and it could only be undone by the future conqueror of all Asia.
The most popular version of how Alexander the Great undid the knot, was a single blow of his sword. The less-cited account is that he found the ends either by cutting into the tangle, or drawing out the pole to which it was tied.
Gordian knot being the proverbial term for a problem that can only be resolved by bold action, the modern contestants for primacy in the Middle East have consistently opted to try the sword solution first, despite the appalling “collateral damage”, meaning innocent victims.
Unsurprisingly, the knot is still firmly tied, the would-be conquerors are on the defensive on fronts they never thought would arise, and their swords are growing blunter by the day.
Israel remains the preeminent local military force, but battlefield success is looking increasingly Pyrrhic; a success that brings such significant harm to the victor that it differs little from defeat.
Their newest enemy is Amnesty International, specifically the organisation’s 296 page report, compiled over six months, that accuses Israel of committing genocide in Gaza.
Among Israel’s pro forma defences is that Hamas used civilians as human shields. That’s weakened by evidence that the Israeli Defence Force (IDF) has been doing the same thing with Palestinian prisoners.
Also, if you want to claim, as Israel does, the mantle of “the world’s most moral army”, you can’t break a moral code and kill tens of thousands of civilians and expect to get a mere slap on the wrist, never mind a pat on the head.
THE KNOT’S PRICE TAG
When the international media finally gets into Gaza and reports on what has been done, Israel will find itself more isolated than embraced for its actions, the reasons and provocation be damned.
Will those government ministers who allowed, encouraged, aided and abetted retribution to become unremitting vengeance pay for it?
Or will the cost be measured in the psyches of soldiers who were ordered to do it?
How deep will the scars be on the soul of a nation founded as a hopeful healing of the horrors wreaked upon Jews by Naziism?
And how different are the attitudes and actions of religious settler zealots who attack Palestinians in the West Bank, from the “brown shirts”, among whose roles was “violent intimidation of political opponents and of Jews.” ?
And if that seems unduly harsh, consider that Ami Ayalon, the former Shin Bet domestic intelligence agency director, characterised the Israeli government’s policy directives for the military as “immoral and unjust,”
On the other side of the “heads-we-win-tails-you-lose” coin, the longer Hamas tries to hold out, the less support it’s likely to enjoy from Gazans when – or if ever — the dust finally settles and the rubble is cleared, even if the movement acknowledges the futility of trying to achieve Palestinian dreams through unwinnable war.
Ass for the U.S., a statement by an unnamed State Department spokesperson that: “Our position on this has not changed, and we continue to believe that allegations of genocide are unfounded” isn’t of Gordian proportion, but it has great possibilities as a noose.
A LESSER BUT STILL COMPLEX KNOT
“One man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter,” may be a cliché, but it also epitomises the conundrum the U.S. and its allies now face in Syria.
The blitz-like offensive against the odious regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad is being spearheaded by Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, which was linked to the Islamic State (ISIS) and Al-Qaeda.
Despite the group’s efforts to build a more moderate image after officially breaking with those movements some years ago, it’s still considered a terrorist group by the United States.
But Hayat Tahrir and its jihadist-prone allies are the best chance for now of overthrowing Assad and potentially cutting the arms pipeline between Iran and Hezbollah.
The resurgence of extremists the U.S. thought had been battered out of contention in Syria, is clear evidence the “bad guys” know how to retreat, lick their wounds and then get back in the game.
The only reasonable, and in the long term viable, way for the “good guys” (who don’t really exist as such) to cut the Middle East knot. is to bear in mind that in spite of his grandiose designation, military genius and power, the single blow method Alexander the Great allegedly used to cut the Gordian knot didn’t bring him the ultimate victory the feat promised.
And then they need to emulate a dictum of arguably the greatest bridge-builders and peacemakers of our time; the late Archbishop Desmond Tutu : “If you want peace, you don’t talk to your friends, you talk to your enemies.”
That’s an elegant way to point out that brains will triumph over brawn.
Comments are welcomed. Click CONTACT on the site header.
To receive e‑mail alerts to new posts, Click SIGN-UP on the header.