WHEN ABSURDITY PASSES FOR WISDOM
On levels ranging from the potentially existential to laughable, the state of the world can be summed up this week in one word:
ABSURD (noun)…”the state or condition in which human beings exist in an irrational and meaningless universe.”
The most important and on a subject matter level, least deserving of the categorisation, is the COP30 climate summit.
Forget topics like “carbon capture” to reduce global warming CO2 dominating the atmosphere. This summit is best summed up as “corporate capture”.
The lobbying group “Kick Big Polluters Out”, (KBPO), calculated that “…fossil fuel lobbyists significantly outnumber almost every country delegation at COP30”. Proportionately, that’s a 12 percent increase from last year’s summit, and “… the largest concentration of fossil fuel lobbyists at COP since KBPO started analysing conference attendees.”
That’s despite new research showing global carbon emissions from fossil fuels are projected to reach a record high in 2025, and “ strong evidence that clean technologies help reduce emissions while being cost effective compared to fossil alternatives.”Add that to the inane pomposity of U.S. President Donald Trump’s admonition to the UN that climate change is “the greatest con job ever perpetrated on the world”, and “absurd” seems a mild characterisation for what’s not happening.
SCIENCE BE DAMNED
On a lesser but no less telling level of absurd in the face of science and reality, is Kim Kardashian, surely one of the more absurd figures to occupy a place of ongoing prominence, being taken seriously for asking whether a comet designated interstellar object 3I/ATLAS was sent to our solar system by an alien intelligence.
Worse, she was in essence given credence by a noted Harvard astrophysicist turned social media flavour of the moment, who pondered whether on December 19, when the comet will be 170 million miles away; “Will 3I/ATLAS send mini-probes towards Earth as Christmas gifts to humanity?”
Scientists who make it their business to do so determined that the comet is billions of years old and originated outside our galaxy.
Since it would take an object travelling at the speed of light 100,000 years to travel half way across the bit of space Earth inhabits, it hardly seems likely 31/ATLAS was designed to interact with mere earthlings exactly when they celebrate an event a relatively minor proportion of them believe took place a mere 2000 years ago.
FAKE IS TRUE IS FAKE
But then, how to make sense of it all when obviously real news is considered fake, and fake real?
Over the past week, I have what seen looks like a growth industry of supposed cell phone videos of passerby heroes confronting louts harassing senior citizens, veterans and other vulnerable persons.
That would be heartening, except they are so well-framed, steady and uninterrupted, they can’t possibly be anything but staged, or AI.
There were also dozens of “heartfelt moments” videos: Bruce Springsteen or Keith Richards giving up their First Class seats on a plane to an elderly, deserving person, an elephant saving a leopard cub in a swollen river, a giraffe doing the same, and at least three versions of an alpha male mountain gorilla handing a small child that fell into its enclosure back to a beaming parent.
All of them garnered innumerable “Likes”, which seems to me an indication that absurd as it may seem, clicking the “Thumb up” icon has become Pavlovian.
IT OUGHT TO BE OBVIOUS
But those are minor on the absurd scale.
As a recent report by the American Psychological Association noted:“AI offers new efficiencies and opportunities, yet its deeper integration into daily life requires careful consideration to ensure that AI tools are safe, especially for adolescents,”
To think that the geniuses who designed and constantly improve and expand AI at what at times seems comet-like speed, cannot recognise the need for such safeguards, and build them into their creations, is as absurd as believing the priority of fossil fuel industry lobbyists at COP30 is alleviating global warming caused by their paymasters.
To end on a less somber type of absurdity, when Brits are fed up with someone incessantly yammering, they’re prone to say: “Put a sock in it”.
The absurdity of “fashion” has offered us a less aggressive alternative — “Put it in its sock”.
The fashion guru who designed the black turtlenecks worn by Steve Jobs (I never knew that material and stitching apart, all black turtlenecks were the same, no matter whose name was on the label) has “designed” a sock to hold an iPhone.
For anything between 150 and 250 dollars, anyone can have one.
How many are sold will be an indicator of the level of absurdity we have reached…at least this week.
Comments are welcomed. Click CONTACT on the site header.
To receive e‑mail alerts to new posts, Click SIGN-UP on the header.
Your message has been sent